Source: www.forum18.org
Date: July 25, 2025
https://www.forum18.org/archiv
By Felix Corley, Forum 18
Ukraine's chief state religious affairs official, Viktor Yelensky, insists
that his office has not rejected a registration application for a
Ukraine-based branch of the Romanian Orthodox Church. However, it failed to
accept or reject the application by 28 November 2024 as the Religion Law
required. He told Forum 18 that the state-backed Orthodox Church of Ukraine
(OCU) must be involved in and agree any solution, even though it is a
different religious community.
Asked why any solution must be acceptable to the OCU, Yelensky responded:
"Because by establishing its structures on other canonical territories, the
Romanian Orthodox Church always gets approval from the other local Orthodox
churches. The refusal to confirm the establishment of those structures with
Local Orthodox Church in Ukraine outrages society and local communities
both in Chernivtsi and Odesa and is perceived as disrespect to Ukraine"
(see below).
The much-amended 1991 Religion Law declares that religion is separate from
the state and that the state does not interfere in religious organisations'
affairs. "The state recognises the right of a religious community to be
subordinate in canonical and organisational matters to any religious
centres (administrations) operating in Ukraine and abroad, except for those
management centres (administrations) located outside Ukraine in a state
recognised as having committed or is committing armed aggression against
Ukraine and/or temporarily occupying part of the territory of Ukraine .."
(see below).
Yelensky failed to respond to Forum 18's request to explain on what legal
basis he had failed to accept or reject the August 2024 registration
application by the new Religious Association (Administration) of the
Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine (see below).
Most ethnic Romanians live in Chernivtsi Region and in Odessa Region, both
of which border Romania and Moldova. About 130 parishes – almost all in
the Ukrainian Orthodox Church historically linked to the Moscow
Patriarchate – hold services fully or partially in Romanian. They are
served by about 200 ethnic Romanian priests (see below).
Yelensky denied to Forum 18 that organisations under the jurisdiction of
the Romanian Orthodox Church are banned in Ukraine (see below).
The new Romanian Orthodox Association's lawyer Eugen Patraș (Yevgeny
Patrash) lodged its application to the State Service for Ethnic Policy and
Freedom of Conscience (DESS) in Kyiv on 28 August 2024. The DESS extended
the one-month deadline for consideration to the maximum three months,
claiming "broad consultations" were needed. It then repeatedly failed to
accept or reject the application (see below).
The Association lodged complaints to President Volodymyr Zelensky and to
the Parliamentary Human Rights Commissioner (Ombudsperson) Dmytro Lubinets.
Both appeals ended back with the DESS, the body that had failed to apply
the Religion Law (see below).
Five days after the Association lodged the application, the SBU security
service banned Patraș (a Romanian citizen only) from entry to his native
Ukraine for three years. "The SBU spoke only in general formulations as to
the reason for the ban, with no mention of the Church," Patraș told Forum
18. "I can only assume though that the ban is linked to that." The SBU did
not respond to Forum 18's question as to whether it banned Patraș's entry
because he lodged the association's registration application (see below).
Patraș points to the fines the European Court of Human Rights in
Strasbourg handed to Moldova in December 2001 for denying registration to
the Bessarabian Metropolitanate of the Romanian Orthodox Church and in
February 2007 for denying registration to the Moldovan True Orthodox
Church. Moldova eventually registered both communities. Ukraine is subject
to the jurisdiction of the Strasbourg court (see below).
Despite the absence of any legal reason why Romanian Orthodox parishes and
organisations cannot gain state registration in Ukraine, officials have
also repeatedly refused individual parishes' re-registration with new
statutes specifying their affiliation with the Romanian Orthodox
Patriarchate (see below).
Parishioners of three ethnic Romanian Orthodox communities in Chernivtsi
Region held meetings where they voted to disaffiliate from the UOC and to
affiliate with the Romanian Orthodox Church. "Parishioners fear the
communities will be liquidated if they remain with the Ukrainian Orthodox
Church," an observer who is not a member of these churches told Forum 18
(see below).
The three Orthodox communities submitted their documents on 19 May to
Chernivtsi Regional Administration with their revised charters, as required
by the Religion Law. The re-registration applications were given to Olena
Bodnar, head of its Culture Department, as she told Forum 18. The next day,
20 May, representatives of the three communities came to the Regional
Administration to withdraw the applications (see below).
"As soon as the applications were lodged, the heads of the communities
started getting phone calls from village mayors, law enforcement officers
and others demanding that they withdraw the applications," a local resident
familiar with the situation told Forum 18. "They threatened that otherwise
any men that signed the applications would be sent to the front". Others
say officials threatened to take all male residents to the front if the
applications were not withdrawn (see below).
Bodnar denied that anyone had threatened the three Orthodox communities.
"I've not heard of any threats. I've not heard of any threats to mobilise
anyone," she told Forum 18. She refused to say what had happened once the
communities lodged the re-registration applications. "I can't give any
information. I am not in the office and don't have the documents to hand"
(see below).
Fr Mihail Stegărescu, a priest of a Romanian Orthodox diocese, serves in
Komishivka (Hagi Curda) in Odessa Region. His parish had to register in
2005 as an autonomous Orthodox community with no affiliation. "Eight times
we lodged re-registration applications under the Romanian Orthodox
Patriarchate," he told Forum 18. "Each time officials refused, so its
registration stayed as it was." He said other local Romanian Orthodox
parishes face the same re-registration denials (see below).
"It is strange that the authorities call for parishes to leave the
Ukrainian Orthodox Church, but when they leave for the Romanian Orthodox
Church officials threaten them with mobilisation, trying to force them into
the Orthodox Church of Ukraine," Patraș told Forum 18. "Each community
must have a free choice of affiliation with no interference from the
authorities" (see below).
Severe human rights violations in Russian-occupied Ukraine
Serious violations of freedom of religion and belief and other human rights
take place within all the Ukrainian territory Russia has illegally occupied
(https://www.forum18.org/archi
Such violations include pressure not only on clergy and parishioners of the
Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), recognised by the Ecumenical
Patriarchate. Pressure is also applied to clergy and parishioners of the
Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), which is historically and ecclesiastically
linked to the Moscow Patriarchate, who refuse to accept UOC dioceses being
taken over directly by the Russian Orthodox Church.
State-supported Orthodox vs. other Orthodox
Successive Ukrainian governments have long desired to see a single dominant
Orthodox Church. Such moves also involved obstructing the revival of the
Romanian Orthodox Church in areas with an ethnic Romanian population which
had been part of Romania until the Soviet invasion and annexation in 1940.
Fr Nicolae Asargiu, a Ukrainian-born Moldovan citizen and priest of the
Bessarabian Orthodox Church (part of the Romanian Orthodox Church), was
working as a Bessarabian priest in his home village in the then Reni
District of Odessa Region in the 1990s. This annoyed the local authorities
and Orthodox clergy loyal to the rival Ukrainian branch of the Moscow
Patriarchate, so Ukraine gave him a five-year entry ban in 1998. The entry
ban expired in 2003 (https://www.forum18.org/archi
Fr Asargiu "was the only one of our priests who was denied entry to
Ukraine, but other priests were banned from working in individual villages
during the rule of President Leonid Kuchma," the Bessarabian Orthodox
Church's leader Metropolitan Petru Paduraru told Forum 18 from the Moldovan
capital Chisinau in May 2005
(https://www.forum18.org/archi
The government allowed other Orthodox jurisdictions to gain legal status.
These included the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), which is historically
and ecclesiastically linked to the Moscow Patriarchate. It also included
from 1993 the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (which chose to remain
completely separate from the Moscow Patriarchate), led from Odessa by
Metropolitan Agafangel (Pashkovsky). Several Orthodox communities
(including Romanian-speaking ones) were allowed to get registration as
autonomous communities with no affiliation.
The government (led by the then President Petro Poroshenko) backed the
formation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) in 2018 and its
successful move to gain recognition as autocephalous by Ecumenical
Patriarch Bartholomew in 2019. The OCU brought together most of the Kyiv
Patriarchate and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, as well as
some bishops and priests of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Ukrainian
government stepped up moves against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC),
which is historically and ecclesiastically linked to the Moscow
Patriarchate.
On 24 August 2024, President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that he had
signed Law No. 3894-IX banning the Russian Orthodox Church – Moscow
Patriarchate (ROC) as well as Ukrainian religious organisations if they
preserve their affiliation with the ROC. The Law came into force on 23
September 2024 (https://www.forum18.org/archi
The state has backed Orthodox communities which seek to transfer
jurisdiction from the UOC to the OCU. Parishioners vote to choose the
parish's affiliation, but force and violence sometimes accompany these
transfers.
On 29 February 2024, the Holy Synod of the Romanian Orthodox Church decided
to "encourage and support the initiatives of the Romanian Orthodox
communities in Ukraine to restore communion with the Mother Church, the
Romanian Patriarchate, through their legal organisation in the religious
structure called the Romanian Orthodox Church of Ukraine".
The Romanian Orthodox Church lists on its website its dioceses and parishes
in countries outside Romania. As of July 2025, it notes that its Church in
Ukraine "is in the process of organisation".
Ethnic Romanian Orthodox in Ukraine – whose parishes are currently part
of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) - are being forced by the impending
ban on UOC organisations which preserve their affiliation with the Russian
Orthodox Church to look for an alternative home.
Local ethnic Romanian Orthodox appear to have various motivations for
seeking to join the Romanian Orthodox Patriarchate. Some look back to the
time when Bukovina and Bessarabia were part of Romania and see this as a
restitution of justice. Others want a full ethnic Romanian spiritual home.
Others again regard the state-backed OCU as uncanonical and fear it will
impose Ukrainianisation.
Asked by Forum 18 on 21 July 2025 if the Romanian Orthodox Church is
forbidden in Ukraine, Viktor Yelensky, head of the State Service for Ethnic
Policy and Freedom of Conscience (DESS) in Kyiv, responded: "Absolutely
not." Asked about the status of the OCU, Yelensky responded: "The Orthodox
Church of Ukraine is not a state/established church in Ukraine."
Ukrainian state officials have repeatedly urged the Romanian Orthodox
Church to recognise the OCU as canonical, something it says must be decided
at a pan-Orthodox level.
"I stress the primary importance of the issue of full recognition of the
Orthodox Church of Ukraine by the Romanian Orthodox Church," the Ukrainian
ambassador to Romania, Ihor Prokopchuk, told local journalists
(https://agerpres.ro/politic/2
at the embassy in Bucharest on 26 June.
Asked whether the state treats Orthodox communities differently to
communities of other faiths, Yelensky did not respond.
Equality, affiliation and registration in the Religion Law
The much-amended 1991 Religion Law declares in Article 5 that religion is
separate from the state. "All religions, faiths and religious organisations
are equal before the law," Article 5 adds. "The establishment of any
advantages or restrictions for one religion, faith or religious
organisation over others is not permitted."
The Law also declares the state's non-interference in religious
organisations' affairs. "The state protects the rights and legitimate
interests of religious organisations", Article 5 continues, and "takes note
of and respects the traditions and internal guidelines of religious
organisations, provided they do not contradict current legislation".
Article 8 declares: "The state recognises the right of a religious
community to be subordinate in canonical and organisational matters to any
religious centres (administrations) operating in Ukraine and abroad, except
for those management centres (administrations) located outside Ukraine in a
state recognised as having committed or is committing armed aggression
against Ukraine and/or temporarily occupying part of the territory of
Ukraine .."
The Law sets out how communities of any faith can determine which religious
centre they might wish to belong to. Article 8 declares that the state
recognises "the free change of this subordination by making appropriate
amendments to the charter (regulations) of the religious community. The
decision to change subordination and make appropriate amendments to the
charter is adopted by the general meeting of the religious community. Such
general meetings of the religious community may be convened by its
members." Two-thirds of a community's members must take part in the
meeting.
Any change of subordination of a local religious community requires the new
statute to be registered if the community wishes to retain its legal
status. Like new local religious communities, this requires at least ten
adult citizens to sign the application and present it with the new statute
and other documentation to the regional administration for registration.
Communities that are part of a larger organisation, whether based in
Ukraine or abroad, must submit a document from the religious centre
confirming that the community is part of it.
Central religious organisations seeking state registration must send their
application to the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of
Conscience (DESS) in Kyiv.
Under Article 14, officials – whether at Regional level or at the DESS
– must accept, reject or request changes to a registration application
within one month. If officials believe they need to request more
information from other officials, they have up to three months.
Officials refuse to consider Romanian Orthodox registration application
In Ukraine, approximately 200 ethnic Romanian Orthodox priests serve at
least 300,000 Romanian speakers. About 130 Orthodox parishes – mostly in
Chernivtsi Region and in Odessa Region, both of which border Romania and
Moldova, as well as in Transcarpathian Region – hold worship services in
Romanian, sometimes alongside Church Slavonic. All these parishes have been
part of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
At a 25 August 2024 meeting, representatives of three Romanian Orthodox
communities that had previously been part of the UOC - one in Chernivtsi
Region and two in Odessa Region – agreed to found a new Religious
Association (Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine.
The meeting appointed Eugen Patraș (Yevgeny Patrash), a lawyer now based
in Bucharest, as its representative.
On 28 August 2024, Patraș lodged the registration application on behalf of
the new Association (seen by Forum18) to the State Service for Ethnic
Policy and Freedom of Conscience (DESS) in Kyiv. The three parishes were
listed as members of the new Association. Included with the application was
a document from the Romanian Orthodox Patriarchate confirming that the new
Association is part of it.
Viktor Yelensky, head of the DESS, responded on 27 September 2024, just
within the one-month deadline specified in the Religion Law (letter seen by
Forum 18). He chose to delay the application by seeking further assessments
of it.
Yelensky claimed that "given that the issue raised problems of inter-state
Romanian/Ukrainian and Ukrainian/Romanian relations and concerns the
foundations of inter-church peace and civil harmony, and the rights of
people belonging to ethnic minorities", the DESS needed to conduct "broad
consultations both within the country, including with scholars, and abroad,
including with the Romanian side".
Yelensky's letter made no reference to any provisions of the Religion Law
in his assertions. "These are illegal demands," Patraș told Forum 18.
Yelensky wrote again on 6 November 2024 (seen by Forum 18). He did not say
if the application had been accepted or rejected and made no reference to
provisions of the Religion Law for failing to give a decision.
Yelensky claimed instead that "the issues raised in your appeal are very
sensitive for Ukrainian and Romanian societies". He then said it would be
"advisable" for agreements to be made between the Orthodox Church of
Ukraine (OCU) and the Romanian Orthodox Church. He said the DESS was
consulting Romania's Foreign Ministry, Romania's State Secretariat for
Religious Affairs and the Romanian Orthodox Church. He did not explain why
it is the role of the DESS to engage in such negotiations.
Yelensky had visited Romania in October 2024 to hold discussions with state
officials and Romanian Orthodox Church representatives on "deepening
inter-state relations over ensuring freedom of conscience" for Romanians in
Ukraine and Ukrainians in Romania.
The DESS organised meetings in Bukovina in November and December 2024
which, as Yelensky stressed, included clergy from the Orthodox Church of
Ukraine (OCU).
Given the DESS' failure to adjudicate on the application within the maximum
three-month deadline, the Religious Association (Administration) of the
Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine could have lodged a suit against the
DESS to court. "We didn't apply to court – for now - as we're hoping for
a diplomatic solution," the lawyer Patraș told Forum 18.
Yelensky insists that the DESS "has not refused" registration of the
Religious Association (Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in
Ukraine. "The DESS merely noted that resolving this issue requires serious
and multilateral consultations," he told Forum 18 on 18 July.
Yelensky then repeated to Forum 18 the arguments he had set out in letters
to the community about what he saw as the need for agreement between the
Romanian Orthodox Patriarchate and the OCU.
Yelensky pointed to the Ecumenical Patriarch's recognition of the OCU in
2019. "This means that the OCU bears responsibility not only for
Ukrainians, but for all Orthodox Christians in Ukraine, regardless of their
ethnic origin," he insisted to Forum 18. "It is thus the OCU's
responsibility to ensure the fulfilment of linguistic, liturgical, and
other religious needs of Orthodox believers of Romanian, Bulgarian, Gagauz,
and other ethnicities within Ukraine."
Yelensky refused to explain which part of the Religion Law empowered him
not to take a decision on the registration application within the maximum
three-month deadline.
Asked why any solution must be acceptable to the OCU, Yelensky responded:
"Because by establishing its structures on other canonical territories, the
Romanian Orthodox Church always gets approval from the other local Orthodox
churches. The refusal to confirm the establishment of those structures with
Local Orthodox Church in Ukraine outrages society and local communities
both in Chernivtsi and Odesa and is perceived as disrespect to Ukraine."
"We fully respect Ukraine – we see no basis for these accusations,"
Patraș told Forum 18. "We simply want to exercise our rights."
Patraș points to the fines the European Court of Human Rights in
Strasbourg handed to Moldova in December 2001 for denying registration to
the Bessarabian Metropolitanate of the Romanian Orthodox Church
(Application No. 45701/99 (https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/en
in February 2007 for denying registration to the Moldovan True Orthodox
Church (Application No. 952/03
(https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/tk
eventually registered both communities
(https://www.forum18.org/archi
Metropolitanate in July 2002 and the True Orthodox Church in August 2007.
Ukraine is subject to the jurisdiction of the Strasbourg court.
A resident of Chernivtsi who has been following developments (who is not
Orthodox), told Forum 18 in July: "The state is more loyal to the OCU, even
though all religious communities should be equal."
Appeals to President, Ombudsperson sent on to DESS
Frustrated by the DESS' refusal to process its registration application in
accordance with the Religion Law, the Religious Association
(Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine appealed to
President Volodymyr Zelensky on 28 February 2025.
The appeal complained that "the intentional delay in registering the
association leads to the unfavourable consequences of 'seizures' by other
religious organisations of places of worship where services are held
partially or completely in Romanian, a fact negatively perceived by the
Romanian community in general".
On 20 March, the Cabinet of Ministers sent the appeal to the DESS. In a
response on 18 April (seen by Forum 18), Viktor Yelensky failed to say why
his office was not accepting or rejecting the registration application. He
spoke instead about meetings the DESS had organised in Bukovina, as well as
consultations with Romanian officials and Romanian Orthodox
representatives.
Yelensky set out the DESS' aim: "Just as the Romanian Orthodox Church has
an Orthodox Ukrainian Vicariate, which encompasses parishes of the
Ukrainian tradition and is subordinate to Patriarch Daniel, the Romanian
Vicariate, directly subordinate to the Primate of the OCU, should operate
within the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), in which representatives of
the Romanian national minority are guaranteed full and unconditional
respect for their liturgical, linguistic, and ritual traditions and the
necessary level of self-government."
Yelensky did not explain under which provision of the Religion Law he was
aiming to organise how Orthodox Churches structure themselves.
On 12 June, the Religious Association (Administration) of the Romanian
Orthodox Church in Ukraine appealed to the Parliamentary Human Rights
Commissioner (Ombudsperson) Dmytro Lubinets. Hanna Barabash, the head of
the department handling the right to freedom of religion or belief,
responded the following day, saying the appeal had been sent to the Cabinet
of Ministers, because it oversees DESS' work. The Cabinet of Ministers in
turn sent the appeal on to the DESS.
Forum 18 asked Barabash in writing on 23 July why the Ombudsperson's Office
had refused to take up the issue of the refusal of the DESS to consider the
application. Forum 18 had received no response by the middle of the working
day in Kyiv of 25 July.
Yelensky's response of 16 July (seen by Forum 18) merely noted that the
DESS "continues to conduct broad consultations on the establishment of
Religious Association (Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in
Ukraine" and said the "final response" would be provided when these are
completed.
The three communities that are part of the new Religious Association
(Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine appealed to the
Romanian President Nicușor Dan on 20 June.
Association representative banned from his native Ukraine - for lodging
application?
On 28 August 2024, Eugen Patraș on behalf of the Religious Association
(Administration) of the Romanian Orthodox Church in Ukraine lodged its
registration application. On 2 September 2024, the SBU security service
imposed on Patraș a three-year ban on entry to Ukraine.
Born in Soviet Ukraine, Patraș became a Romanian citizen (having to give
up Ukrainian citizenship) and lives in Bucharest. He heads the Eudoxiu
Hurmuzachi Romanian Cultural Centre in Chernivtsi, which has state
registration.
Patraș found out that he had been banned from entering Ukraine only on 19
November 2024, when he was trying to travel to Chernivtsi. On 27 November,
he tried to find out from the SBU why it had banned him. On 29 November,
Mykhailo Petrov, head of the SBU in Chernivtsi Region, responded to Patraș
(seen by Forum 18) confirming that it had ordered him banned from entry.
Patraș lodged a challenge to the ban in court in December 2024. The case
is continuing in Chernivtsi Administrative Court.
"The ban came just five days after I lodged the registration application,"
Patraș told Forum 18. "The SBU spoke only in general formulations as to
the reason for the ban, with no mention of the Church. I can only assume
though that the ban is linked to that."
Patraș says the SBU has banned entry to Ukraine to other Romanian citizens
over the years, including journalists and priests.
Forum 18 asked the SBU security service's Press Service in Kyiv in writing
on 21 July 2025 why it had banned Patraș from entering Ukraine. It also
asked whether he would be allowed in after 28 August 2027, when the
three-year ban has expired. Forum 18 had received no response by the middle
of the working day in Kyiv of 25 July.
Orthodox transfers of jurisdiction, multiple applications rejected
Orthodox priest Fr Mihail Stegărescu is ethnic Romanian and currently
serves in Romanian in Komishivka (Hagi Curda), a village in Ismail
District, Odessa Region. His church of St Peter and St Paul, which is
regularly attended by several dozen ethnic Romanian parishioners, is part
of the Romanian Patriarchate's Diocese of Southern Bessarabia, based in
Cahul in neighbouring Moldova.
"We built the church ourselves from 2008," Fr Stegărescu told Forum 18 on
23 July. "We consecrated it in 2019." The community gained Ukrainian state
registration in 2005 but as an autonomous Orthodox community with no
affiliation.
"Eight times we lodged re-registration applications under the Romanian
Orthodox Patriarchate," Fr Stegărescu. "Each time officials refused, so
its registration stayed as it was."
Until 2019, Fr Stegărescu served in St Paraskeva Church in the
neighbouring village of Priozerne (Cemașir). The parish was first
registered in 1991 as part of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow
Patriarchate. The UOC then ousted him and appointed a new priest. The
parish still has state registration, though it is listed simply as the
Orthodox Parish of St Paraskeva Church with no other affiliation.
Fr Stegărescu says the parish six times lodged applications for its
statute to be re-registered listing the affiliation as the Bessarabian
Diocese. "Officials rejected all these applications," he told Forum 18.
Fr Stegărescu said a new Romanian Orthodox church was built in the nearby
town of Reni. "It gained registration in 2018, but again, only as an
autonomous community. In 2023 it tried to re-register its new statute
stating that it is part of the Romanian Patriarchate. Officials refused,
saying you can't be registered under the Romanian Church because this does
not exist in Ukraine. Officials did not fulfil the law."
Fr Stegărescu said a large new community has formed in Ismail. "It lodged
a registration application as an autonomous community, but five times
officials rejected it. They said: This is wrong, that is wrong." He notes
that the statute the community submitted was modelled on the statute of a
Romanian Orthodox parish in Chernivtsi that gained registration as an
autonomous community in 2023.
Fr Stegărescu says the communities can function, but the Romanian Orthodox
Church as a whole has no legal status in Ukraine. "So officials don't
invite us to events and we can't invite priests from Romania to serve here
permanently – they can come for only three months at a time." He adds
that his Bishop, Veniamin (Goreanu), can visit from Moldova, "but he is
kept under close watch".
In Chernivtsi, the Chapel of the Metropolitans of Bukovina – built in the
19th century, restored in the 1990s and used as a place of worship by
Romanian believers for the last three decades – is located on the central
alley in the Orthodox part of the city's cemetery. The crypt contains the
tombs of prominent local Romanians, including many Bukovina hierarchs. In
September 2024, the local authorities took over the chapel and offered it
to the OCU. It is now locked and unused.
Orthodox churches with both ethnic Ukrainians and Romanians in the
congregation are also affected. On 17 June 2025, several dozen masked men
interrupted the worship service at Chernivtsi's Holy Spirit Orthodox
cathedral. The cathedral – currently in the hands of the Ukrainian
Orthodox Church (UOC) – holds services mainly in Church Slavonic but also
in Romanian. The intruders beat some of the clergy, according to local
media. That day, hundreds of people gathered in front of the cathedral,
including many Romanians, who oppose the cathedral's takeover by the OCU.
Two more UOC churches (one of which held some services in Romanian) were
also seized in Chernivtsi.
Two other UOC churches with similar significance and history, and in which
services were also held in Romanian, were also taken over in the city of
Storozhynets.
In a meeting with UOC Metropolitan Melety (Yegorenko) of Chernivtsi and
Bukovina in May, about 30 UOC priests expressed their intention to
affiliate with the Romanian Orthodox Church.
The Romanian Orthodox Patriarchate told Radio Free Europe's Romanian
Service
(https://romania.europalibera.
that in early May it received requests from four large communities in the
Chernivtsi Region, accompanied by hundreds of signatures from priests and
parishioners, to come under the jurisdiction of the Romanian Orthodox
Church, "which is what happened".
The Romanian Orthodox Patriarchate stated that it is not providing the
names of the communities and priests, "for their protection from the
subsequent threats and coercion to which they were subjected."
Threats precede withdrawal of re-registration applications
Parishioners of three ethnic Romanian Orthodox communities in Chernivtsi
Region – from Nyzhni Petrivtsy, Hrushivtsy and Boiany – held meetings
where they voted to disaffiliate from the UOC and to affiliate with the
Romanian Orthodox Church. "Almost no one was against the decision," an
observer who is not a member of these churches told Forum 18. "Parishioners
fear the communities will be liquidated if they remain with the Ukrainian
Orthodox Church."
The three Orthodox communities submitted their documents on 19 May to
Chernivtsi Regional Administration with their revised charters, as required
by the Religion Law. "The chancellery recorded receipt of the
applications," a local resident familiar with the situation told Forum 18.
The re-registration applications were given to Olena Bodnar, head of its
Culture Department, as she told Forum 18 on 23 July.
The next day, 20 May, representatives of the three communities came to the
Regional Administration to withdraw the applications.
"As soon as the applications were lodged, the heads of the communities
started getting phone calls from village mayors, law enforcement officers
and others demanding that they withdraw the applications," the local
resident told Forum 18. "They threatened that otherwise any men that signed
the applications would be sent to the front. After they went the following
day to withdraw the applications, the calls and unpleasantness stopped."
Other reports say threats included to mobilise the priests and all the men
in these villages and send them to the front, not just those that signed
the re-registration applications. "The authorities told us that they would
search in detail, in the village, all the young people and take them to the
front," one of the priests told Radio Free Europe's Romanian Service
(https://romania.europalibera.
Two priests from Chernivtsi Region confirmed to Radio Free Europe's
Romanian Service
(https://romania.europalibera.
for a 29 June article that the three communities had been forced to
withdraw the applications.
Bodnar denied that anyone had threatened the three Orthodox communities.
"I've not heard of any threats. I've not heard of any threats to mobilise
anyone," she told Forum 18 on 23 July. "They brought the documents and
there is a procedure for dealing with them." She refused to say what had
happened once the communities lodged the re-registration applications. "I
can't give any information. I am not in the office and don't have the
documents to hand."
"We wanted to leave the affiliation of the Russian Church, including in the
midst of the war, which Patriarch Kirill supports," an ethnic Romanian
Orthodox priest from a Romanian community in Chernivtsi Region, who wants
to affiliate with the Romanian Orthodox Church, told RFE/RL
(https://romania.europalibera.
"But we want to return to the Romanian Orthodox Church, not to join the
Orthodox Church of Ukraine. We are being hindered on all sides."
The priest did not want to give his name for fear of reprisals, after the
threats to the three communities which tried to lodge re-registration
applications.
"It is strange that the authorities call for parishes to leave the
Ukrainian Orthodox Church, but when they leave for the Romanian Orthodox
Church officials threaten them with mobilisation, trying to force them into
the Orthodox Church of Ukraine," Eugen Patraș told Forum 18. "Each
community must have a free choice of affiliation with no interference from
the authorities." (END)
More reports on freedom of thought, conscience and belief in all Ukraine
(https://www.forum18.org/archi
More reports on freedom of thought, conscience and belief in
Russian-occupied Ukraine (https://www.forum18.org/archi
Follow us on Bluesky @Forum18
(https://bsky.app/profile/foru
Follow us on Facebook @Forum18NewsService
(https://www.facebook.com/Foru
Follow us on Telegram @Forum18NewsService
(https://t.me/s/forum18newsser
Follow us on WhatsApp Forum 18
(https://www.whatsapp.com/chan
Follow us on X/Twitter @Forum_18 (https://x.com/forum_18)
All Forum 18 material may be referred to, quoted from, or republished in
full, if Forum 18 is credited as the source.
All photographs that are not Forum 18's copyright are attributed to the
copyright owner. If you reuse any photographs from Forum 18's website, you
must seek permission for any reuse from the copyright owner or abide by the
copyright terms the copyright owner has chosen.
© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855.